16 Jul
2009
16 Jul
'09
8:15 p.m.
Disadvantages:
The persisted objects must be subclasses of MOEmbeddedObject that is
one downside.
John why?
May be just a trait would be nice since you could plug your layer in
any domain objects.
I was just planning to do a stupid traits to save magritte described
object in XML.
I was planning to do the same with SandStone: turning the root class
in a trait and get free
from framework tyranny.
Also you cannot recursively embed objects. This kind
of thing can be
insidious so you have to be careful with what you describe as an
embedded object/collection.
Moe is only meant to make the db mirror your application data.
Redundant storage only.
It's very simple.
Advantages:
Its *very* simple :)
3) Is this project similar to SqueakSave?
http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/projects/sqsave/index.html
No way. That looks pretty awesome, though. I have to check it out..
ps: if you have to user another database instead of postgres, you
know there is SqueakDBX ;)
BTW it could use a few more tests :)