Hi, I'm sorry because I still write about the problem with unitTest for the action.
Could you tell me please why it's so hard to test with request response.
Could I make an object request and response in test and use parameter?
thanks a lot
> Hi, could you explain me better what are the problem with
> please? Is it hard to test because are html application or is hard
> to do the assert?
Yes, exactly it is hard to check the resulting html. Of course you
could parse it and check for specific tags and contents, or you could
write regular-expressions ...
What is more, the actions in SmallWiki 1 are badly designed, since
they heavily couple the business logic and the swazoo html
generation. Sadly it is almost impossible to test the actions wihout
dealing with request/response ...
SmallWiki 2 takes a different approach to avoid this problem and thus
the actions (actually these are commands following the design
patterns book) can be easily tested.
6X velocizzare la tua navigazione a 56k? 6X Web Accelerator di Libero!
Scaricalo su INTERNET GRATIS 6X http://www.libero.it