28 Sep
2004
28 Sep
'04
9:25 p.m.
Hi charles
I'm fed up with store. really.
So I tried to publish the work of frederick on store but since we
worked with our version of SmallWiki
Store does not let us publish it as a follow up of the smallWiki
available on cincom store......
I prefer not to comment on that.
Stef
28 Sep
28 Sep
9:30 p.m.
On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:25 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
Hi charles
I'm fed up with store. really.
So I tried to publish the work of frederick on store but since we
worked with our version of SmallWiki
Store does not let us publish it as a follow up of the smallWiki
available on cincom store......
Gee, maybe you should port Monticello to VW... ;)
Avi
29 Sep
29 Sep
3:26 p.m.
please, StORE works pretty well most of the time, it has its quirks that
is all
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:30:33 +0200, Avi Bryant <avi(a)beta4.com> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:25 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Hi charles
I'm fed up with store. really.
So I tried to publish the work of frederick on store but since we
worked with our version of SmallWiki
Store does not let us publish it as a follow up of the smallWiki
available on cincom store......
Gee, maybe you should port Monticello to VW... ;)
Avi
3:03 p.m.
charles
have you look at the code inside?
because this is quite ugly and I think that VW deserves a much better
tools at the level of merging,
configurations....
Stef
On 29 sept. 04, at 15:26, Charles A. Monteiro wrote:
please, StORE works pretty well most of the time, it
has its quirks
that is all
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:30:33 +0200, Avi Bryant <avi(a)beta4.com> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:25 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Hi charles
I'm fed up with store. really.
So I tried to publish the work of frederick on store but since we
worked with our version of SmallWiki
Store does not let us publish it as a follow up of the smallWiki
available on cincom store......
Gee, maybe you should port Monticello to VW... ;)
Avi
4:40 p.m.
I don't care about ugly code as long as I don't have to maintain it :) but
it does have to be useful to me.
my only other experiences with source code management tools has been with
Envy and CVS. StORE I find better than CVS. StORE allows me to things that
Envy did not allow me to do but overall the merging yes is better than
StORE. I have also only used StORE in the context of very small teams i.e.
2 to 3 developers. A lot of the potentially painful merging issues are
minimized by integrating often which is what I strive to do. So far I have
managed okay.
Can it be a better tool , yes. Taking the time to port to something new
after the investment made and being made including upcoming functionality
such as SmallDoc etc, not really sure, probably not.
-Charles
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:03:48 +0200, stéphane ducasse
<ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
charles
have you look at the code inside?
because this is quite ugly and I think that VW deserves a much better
tools at the level of merging,
configurations....
Stef
On 29 sept. 04, at 15:26, Charles A. Monteiro wrote:
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
please, StORE works pretty well most of the time,
it has its quirks
that is all
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:30:33 +0200, Avi Bryant <avi(a)beta4.com> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:25 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Hi charles
I'm fed up with store. really.
So I tried to publish the work of frederick on store but since we
worked with our version of SmallWiki
Store does not let us publish it as a follow up of the smallWiki
available on cincom store......
Gee, maybe you should port Monticello to VW... ;)
Avi
7143
days inactive
7144
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Avi Bryant -
Charles A. Monteiro -
stéphane ducasse