From cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com Sat May 23 14:36:30 2015
From: Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com>
To: smallwiki@list.inf.unibe.ch
Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Pillar 0.56 : New features, new syntax
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:36:24 +0200
Message-ID:
 <CAMyorgAyYe2-nokofMPPVRgJDTLdmsVS5M+QVduztE1QMspxnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <EC6F0193-8C73-4DCD-AB20-83518E3F456D@hartl.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0804563623727408734=="

--===============0804563623727408734==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi.
We used '@' because Pier used it this way. I'm afraid that if we
change the character that will break Pier.
But if you write *Chapter 1>../Chapter1/chapter1.pillar(a)cha:chapter1*
and export in HTML you'll get
<a href="../Chapter1/chapter1.html#cha:chapter1"> I. Chapter 1 </a>

On 23 May 2015 at 08:44, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote:
> Cyril,
>
> Am 22.05.2015 um 23:12 schrieb Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com>:
>
> The second main change is the Internal Links.
> Now when you want to reefer to an anchor, a figure or a script you'll
> need to use *@anchor* instead of *anchor*.
> I'm sorry for that but that's the easiest way to implement the
> inter-files links.
>
>
> why @? It is about links and how to point to a fragment inside a resource.
> This already exists and is called fragment identifier
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier
>
> You do it by using # the separate the resource and the fragment in an URI.
>
> '../chapters/chapter1.pillar#section1'
>
> is complete valid URI and the way to go. Can you change that?
>
> Norbert
>



-- 
Cheers
Cyril Ferlicot

--===============0804563623727408734==--