Hi, Sorry for the trouble. FAMIX 3.0 is a construction site and the information is not consistent. The website shows the beta 14 version which is about half a year old. The current and running one can be found in the Famix-Specification package in the http://www.squeaksource.com/Moose Squeak repository. I will try to put a new image and the specification online in the following days. Cheers, Doru On Oct 9, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Simon Denier wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Hi Stef, We have it :). It is in the Famix-Specification package. I will post it on the website as soon as I get around to do that. Cheers, Doru On Oct 9, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Thanks for your clarification, it helps! Now I can compare the generated code under VW with Squeak (as well as with Fame4Java but it's another story) The code seems fine except for Association>>below as well as Access>>isRead Both are implemented with 'self shoudBeImplemented' Both are derived attributes Association>>below is the opposite attribute of Association>>above It seems obvious that isRead is derived from isWrite. there should be some code at least to update the one-to-one relationship between above<->below. did I miss something? On 9 oct. 08, at 14:53, Tudor Girba wrote: -- Simon Denier, PhD Postdoc, Ptidej Team DIRO, Université de Montréal _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

On 12 oct. 08, at 12:12, Tudor Girba wrote: Sorry for the cross-post, but since I guess it can be of interest for eberybody. So I understand the rationale, but the squeak code generator and the Java code generator are not consistent. - in Java some code is generated, more specifically in Famix3: - above<->below is a one-to-one relationship and the update code can be generated (as is the case in Fame Java) - isRead is implemented as a normal attribute complete with an instance variable, without any update code - but it should be a derived attribute - in squeak both are left as 'shouldBeImplemented' Actually I think that both are 50% right/50% wrong. Fame Java does it right when generating the update code for one-one relationship, but is wrong when it implements isRead - the derived property is lost and this is something which is easily overlooked - as you say it should be left as is. > Cheers, > Doru > > > On Oct 10, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Simon Denier wrote: > >> Thanks for your clarification, it helps! >> >> Now I can compare the generated code under VW with Squeak (as >> well as >> with Fame4Java but it's another story) >> >> The code seems fine except for Association>>below as well as >> Access>>isRead >> Both are implemented with 'self shoudBeImplemented' >> Both are derived attributes >> Association>>below is the opposite attribute of Association>>above >> It seems obvious that isRead is derived from isWrite. >> >> there should be some code at least to update the one-to-one >> relationship between above<->below. >> >> did I miss something? >>

Hi Doru, I would like to import Moose Package in a Moose Model, but I have an exception. The exception is : "Unhandled exception: NonBoolean". This appears on the Class "SampleData" When I delete this class, Moose package is imported. But this is not a good solution :) Have you any idea of the problem ? Thanks Jannik _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

I am lost. Can you provide me a precise bug report?

cheers, AA On 13 Oct 2008, at 11:01 , Simon Denier wrote: _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev