Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
24 Jan
2016
24 Jan
'16
12:43 p.m.
Hi,
I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less the
same magnitude:
Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
504: 1 min 55
1175: 4 min 25
Well there is a delta...
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration (120
secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
But, there is a large difference in GC time:
504: not spur
**Memory**
old +144,822,000 bytes
young -8,293,660 bytes
used +136,528,340 bytes
free -104,186,788 bytes
**GCs**
full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1175: spur
**Memory**
old +0 bytes
young +340,048 bytes
used +340,048 bytes
free -340,048 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
20715.0ms
incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
Total GC time
504: 43 secs
1175: 176 secs
See the performance reports attached.
I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
[mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
Hi,
I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
- October 7:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
- yesterday:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like to
understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself, but
maybe it comes from somewhere else.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck
<marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
before and
after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before Spur)
and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
Cheers,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it loads
twice as
slow with Spur than before:
- PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
- Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
Here is the reference file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
And here is the script:
[
MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
(FileSystem workingDirectory /
'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
] timeToRun
Do you get the same?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
that makes the solution obvious."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
24 Jan
24 Jan
1:38 p.m.
New subject: Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
I can confirm more time taken
[
MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
(FileSystem workingDirectory / '../../src' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse')
fullName).
] timeProfile
I wonder what happens if you block the UI while loading
1178 spur (50542 on vm 420)
- 85216 tallies, 85302 msec.
**Tree**
--------------------------------
Process: (40s) Morphic UI Process: nil
--------------------------------
32.7% {27886ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:
|32.7% {27860ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:withMetamodel:
| 32.7% {27854ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>run
| 32.7% {27854ms} FMMSEParser>>run
| 32.6% {27850ms} FMMSEParser>>basicRun
| 32.6% {27850ms} FMMSEParser>>Document
| 32.4% {27648ms} FMMSEParser>>Element
| 22.4% {19072ms} FMMSEParser>>Attribute
| |8.5% {7209ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>endAttribute:
| | |8.4% {7169ms} FMFutureElement>>endAttribute:
| | | 8.4% {7151ms} FMFutureAttribute>>endAttribute:
| | | 8.4% {7129ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 4.4% {3753ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |4.3% {3653ms}
FAMIXMethod(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 4.3% {3633ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | 1.3% {1079ms}
FAMIXParameter(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | 1.3% {1067ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | 1.2% {1059ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | 1.2% {1051ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | 1.2% {1051ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | 1.2% {1051ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.2% {1051ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.1% {960ms} primitives
| | | 3.9% {3308ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.6% {1343ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| | | 1.4% {1180ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| |5.9% {4996ms} FMMSEParser>>Value
| | |3.7% {3166ms} FMMSEParser>>Reference
| | | |2.3% {1945ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| | | | 1.4% {1232ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | | 1.3% {1080ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | 1.2% {1062ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | 1.2% {1034ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.2% {1024ms} primitives
| | |1.7% {1425ms} FMMSEParser>>Primitive
| | | 1.2% {1033ms} FMMSEParser>>Number
| |5.2% {4420ms} FMMSEParser>>tNAME
| | |4.1% {3503ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | | 3.5% {2987ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | 3.1% {2667ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | 3.1% {2641ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | 3.0% {2585ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | 3.0% {2547ms} primitives
| |2.2% {1876ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginAttribute:
| | 2.2% {1852ms} FMFutureElement>>beginAttribute:
| | 1.8% {1558ms} PhexMatcher>>beTrue
| | 1.7% {1487ms} PhexMatcher>>true
| | 1.6% {1405ms}
PhexMatcher>>expectedUnknownMessageToReturn:
| 6.0% {5156ms} FMMSEParser>>Serial
| |4.8% {4131ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>serial:
| | |4.8% {4125ms} FMFutureElement>>serial:
| | | 4.8% {4121ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>assign:to:
| | | 4.1% {3524ms} FMDanglingReference>>resolve:
| | | 3.4% {2859ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 2.0% {1706ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |1.9% {1646ms}
FAMIXMethod(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 1.9% {1624ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | 1.3% {1137ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| |1.1% {905ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| 2.0% {1680ms} FMMSEParser>>tFULLNAME
| |1.6% {1325ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | 1.3% {1075ms} Character>>isLetter
| | 1.1% {969ms} Character>>characterSet
| | 1.1% {953ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | 1.1% {937ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | 1.1% {917ms} primitives
| 1.6% {1395ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginElement:
| 1.6% {1357ms} FMFutureElement class>>with:name:
| 1.6% {1353ms} FMFutureElement>>with:name:
| 1.4% {1195ms} FM3MetaDescription>>createInstance
| 1.4% {1163ms} FAMIXImplicitVariable
class(Behavior)>>new
1.4% {1183ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAddAll:
1.4% {1157ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAdd:
--------------------------------
Process: other processes
--------------------------------
36.2% {30857ms} InputEventFetcher>>eventLoop
36.2% {30857ms} InputEventFetcher>>waitForInput
29.4% {25047ms} Semaphore>>waitTimeoutMSecs:
29.4% {25047ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
**Leaves**
36.2% {30857ms} InputEventFetcher>>waitForInput
29.4% {25047ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
7.8% {6637ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
3.6% {3102ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
1.4% {1213ms} FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
1.3% {1125ms} ByteString(String)>>=
1.1% {914ms} PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
**Memory**
old +134,217,728 bytes
young -134,644,032 bytes
used -426,304 bytes
free +134,644,032 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 56,554ms (66.0% uptime), avg 8079.0ms
incr 3309 totalling 13,509ms (16.0% uptime), avg 4.0ms
tenures 7,140,590 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1178 Spur (50542 on vm 403)
- 87658 tallies, 87744 msec.
**Tree**
--------------------------------
Process: (40s) Morphic UI Process: nil
--------------------------------
34.1% {29962ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:
|34.1% {29954ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:withMetamodel:
| 34.1% {29952ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>run
| 34.1% {29952ms} FMMSEParser>>run
| 34.1% {29948ms} FMMSEParser>>basicRun
| 34.1% {29948ms} FMMSEParser>>Document
| 33.9% {29764ms} FMMSEParser>>Element
| 22.8% {19998ms} FMMSEParser>>Attribute
| |9.1% {7992ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>endAttribute:
| | |9.1% {7972ms} FMFutureElement>>endAttribute:
| | | 9.1% {7968ms} FMFutureAttribute>>endAttribute:
| | | 9.1% {7964ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 5.2% {4538ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |5.1% {4444ms}
FAMIXMethod(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 5.0% {4386ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | 1.5% {1287ms}
FAMIXParameter(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | |1.5% {1283ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | 1.4% {1255ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | 1.4% {1247ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | 1.4% {1247ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | 1.4% {1247ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.4% {1247ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.3% {1177ms} primitives
| | | | 1.1% {968ms}
FAMIXMethod(FAMIXBehaviouralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | |1.1% {968ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | 1.1% {954ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | 1.1% {952ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | 1.1% {952ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | 1.1% {952ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.1% {952ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.0% {888ms} primitives
| | | | 1.1% {958ms} FAMIXInvocation>>receiver:
| | | | 1.1% {954ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | 1.0% {910ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | 1.0% {900ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | 1.0% {900ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | 1.0% {900ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.0% {900ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | 3.8% {3367ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.6% {1395ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.1% {979ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| |5.8% {5121ms} FMMSEParser>>Value
| | |3.6% {3197ms} FMMSEParser>>Reference
| | | |2.4% {2122ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| | | | 1.6% {1399ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | | 1.4% {1243ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | 1.4% {1225ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | 1.4% {1199ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.3% {1153ms} primitives
| | |1.8% {1552ms} FMMSEParser>>Primitive
| | | 1.3% {1169ms} FMMSEParser>>Number
| |5.2% {4562ms} FMMSEParser>>tNAME
| | |4.1% {3565ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | | 3.5% {3068ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | 3.2% {2816ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | 3.2% {2782ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | 3.1% {2722ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | 3.0% {2658ms} primitives
| |2.0% {1726ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginAttribute:
| | 1.9% {1684ms} FMFutureElement>>beginAttribute:
| | 1.6% {1425ms} PhexMatcher>>beTrue
| | 1.5% {1351ms} PhexMatcher>>true
| | 1.4% {1243ms}
PhexMatcher>>expectedUnknownMessageToReturn:
| 6.1% {5343ms} FMMSEParser>>Serial
| |5.0% {4374ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>serial:
| | 5.0% {4370ms} FMFutureElement>>serial:
| | 5.0% {4370ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>assign:to:
| | 4.2% {3708ms} FMDanglingReference>>resolve:
| | 3.4% {3027ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | 2.1% {1864ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | |2.1% {1812ms}
FAMIXInheritance(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | 2.0% {1790ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | 1.3% {1131ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| 2.3% {2034ms} FMMSEParser>>tFULLNAME
| |1.8% {1606ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | 1.6% {1401ms} Character>>isLetter
| | 1.5% {1305ms} Character>>characterSet
| | 1.5% {1295ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | 1.5% {1275ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | 1.4% {1259ms} primitives
| 2.3% {1998ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginElement:
| 2.2% {1948ms} FMFutureElement class>>with:name:
| 2.2% {1948ms} FMFutureElement>>with:name:
| 2.0% {1774ms} FM3MetaDescription>>createInstance
| 2.0% {1740ms} FAMIXLocalVariable
class(Behavior)>>new
1.4% {1207ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAddAll:
1.3% {1183ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAdd:
--------------------------------
Process: other processes
--------------------------------
64.1% {56239ms} Semaphore>>waitTimeoutMSecs:
64.1% {56239ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
**Leaves**
64.1% {56239ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
9.1% {7960ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
4.5% {3922ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
1.6% {1431ms} ByteSymbol(String)>>=
**Memory**
old +134,217,728 bytes
young -133,875,776 bytes
used +341,952 bytes
free +133,875,776 bytes
**GCs**
full 8 totalling 57,100ms (65.0% uptime), avg 7138.0ms
incr 3317 totalling 14,673ms (17.0% uptime), avg 4.0ms
tenures 7,133,411 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
504 Non-spur (50370)
- 42377 tallies, 42492 msec.
**Tree**
--------------------------------
Process: other processes
--------------------------------
4.0% {1701ms} Semaphore>>waitTimeoutMSecs:
4.0% {1701ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
--------------------------------
Process: (40s) Morphic UI Process: nil
--------------------------------
92.3% {39219ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:
|92.2% {39179ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:withMetamodel:
| 92.2% {39175ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>run
| 92.2% {39175ms} FMMSEParser>>run
| 92.2% {39163ms} FMMSEParser>>basicRun
| 92.2% {39163ms} FMMSEParser>>Document
| 84.4% {35866ms} FMMSEParser>>Element
| |59.5% {25266ms} FMMSEParser>>Attribute
| | |23.1% {9814ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>endAttribute:
| | | |23.0% {9777ms} FMFutureElement>>endAttribute:
| | | | 23.0% {9767ms} FMFutureAttribute>>endAttribute:
| | | | 23.0% {9753ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | | 12.9% {5465ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | | |12.6% {5363ms}
FAMIXInvocation(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | | 12.6% {5344ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | | 3.2% {1378ms}
FAMIXLocalVariable(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | | |3.2% {1378ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | | 3.2% {1372ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | | 3.2% {1364ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | | 3.2% {1364ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | | 3.2% {1364ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 3.2% {1364ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 3.0% {1281ms} primitives
| | | | | 2.9% {1219ms}
FAMIXMethod(FAMIXBehaviouralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | | |2.9% {1217ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | | 2.9% {1217ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | | 2.9% {1217ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | | 2.9% {1217ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | | 2.9% {1217ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 2.9% {1217ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 2.7% {1133ms} primitives
| | | | | 2.8% {1189ms} FAMIXInvocation>>receiver:
| | | | | |2.8% {1187ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | | 2.8% {1179ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | | 2.8% {1175ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | | 2.8% {1175ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | | 2.8% {1175ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 2.8% {1175ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 2.6% {1087ms} primitives
| | | | | 1.7% {734ms}
ByteSymbol(Symbol)>>asMutator
| | | | | 1.6% {694ms}
ByteString(String)>>asSymbol
| | | | | 1.5% {628ms} Symbol class>>intern:
| | | | | 1.5% {626ms} Symbol class>>lookup:
| | | | | 1.5% {626ms} WeakSet>>like:
| | | | | 1.5% {622ms} WeakSet>>scanFor:
| | | | | 1.2% {495ms}
ByteString(String)>>hash
| | | | | 1.1% {481ms} primitives
| | | | 9.9% {4216ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | | 4.0% {1705ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | | |1.6% {680ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | | | |1.2% {501ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | | |1.3% {574ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| | | | 2.9% {1252ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| | | | |2.1% {896ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
| | | | | 1.0% {441ms} FMMultivalueLink>>do:
| | | | 2.0% {852ms} ByteString(String)>>=
| | | | 1.9% {828ms} primitives
| | |15.4% {6526ms} FMMSEParser>>tNAME
| | | |12.2% {5185ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | | | |10.7% {4561ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | | | |9.9% {4212ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | | | 9.8% {4166ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | | | 9.7% {4112ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 9.5% {4052ms} primitives
| | | | |1.2% {496ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | |1.1% {486ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | | 1.0% {444ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | 1.0% {442ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | | 1.0% {436ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.0% {426ms} primitives
| | |13.2% {5616ms} FMMSEParser>>Value
| | | |8.2% {3480ms} FMMSEParser>>Reference
| | | | |5.1% {2187ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| | | | | |3.7% {1559ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | | | | 3.4% {1429ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | | | 3.3% {1419ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | | | 3.3% {1407ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 3.2% {1379ms} primitives
| | | | |2.0% {860ms}
MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>referenceNumber:
| | | | | 2.0% {858ms} FMFutureAttribute>>referenceNumber:
| | | |4.3% {1837ms} FMMSEParser>>Primitive
| | | | 3.1% {1328ms} FMMSEParser>>Number
| | | | 1.9% {794ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | | 1.7% {738ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | 1.7% {738ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | | 1.7% {730ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.7% {722ms} primitives
| | |6.3% {2687ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginAttribute:
| | | 6.2% {2645ms} FMFutureElement>>beginAttribute:
| | | 4.3% {1825ms} PhexMatcher>>beTrue
| | | |4.2% {1767ms} PhexMatcher>>true
| | | | 3.9% {1675ms}
PhexMatcher>>expectedUnknownMessageToReturn:
| | | | 2.5% {1077ms} Array(Collection)>>copyWithout:
| | | | |2.4% {1041ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>reject:
| | | | | 1.3% {566ms} Array
class(SequenceableCollection class)>>new:streamContents:
| | | | | |1.0% {445ms} primitives
| | | | | 1.1% {475ms} primitives
| | | | 1.4% {578ms}
PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
| | | | 1.2% {527ms} primitives
| | | 1.9% {788ms} FMFutureAttribute class>>with:name:
| | | 1.8% {778ms} FMFutureAttribute>>with:name:
| | | 1.3% {543ms} primitives
| |14.6% {6224ms} FMMSEParser>>Serial
| | |12.1% {5136ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>serial:
| | | |12.1% {5124ms} FMFutureElement>>serial:
| | | | 12.1% {5122ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>assign:to:
| | | | 9.9% {4215ms} FMDanglingReference>>resolve:
| | | | |7.6% {3215ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | | | |4.1% {1737ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | | | | |3.9% {1671ms}
FAMIXAccess(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | | | | 3.9% {1662ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {888ms}
FAMIXParameter(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {884ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {882ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {882ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {882ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {882ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | | 2.1% {882ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | | 1.8% {776ms}
primitives
| | | | | |3.4% {1452ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | | | | 1.5% {650ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| | | | | | |1.2% {513ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
| | | | | | 1.0% {443ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | | |2.2% {929ms} PhexMatcher>>beTrue
| | | | | 2.2% {920ms} PhexMatcher>>true
| | | | | 2.1% {874ms}
PhexMatcher>>expectedUnknownMessageToReturn:
| | | | | 1.4% {582ms}
Array(Collection)>>copyWithout:
| | | | | 1.3% {574ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>reject:
| | | | | 1.1% {457ms} Array
class(SequenceableCollection class)>>new:streamContents:
| | | | 1.1% {481ms} PhexMatcher>>>=
| | | | 1.1% {447ms} PhexMatcher>>expect:using:
| | | | 1.0% {429ms}
PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
| | |2.3% {962ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| | | 1.6% {665ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | 1.4% {595ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | 1.4% {583ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | 1.4% {575ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.3% {569ms} primitives
| |5.2% {2230ms} FMMSEParser>>tFULLNAME
| | |4.1% {1737ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | | 3.6% {1538ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | 3.4% {1452ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | 3.4% {1438ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | 3.3% {1418ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | 3.3% {1398ms} primitives
| |4.3% {1813ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginElement:
| | 4.1% {1725ms} FMFutureElement class>>with:name:
| | 4.0% {1715ms} FMFutureElement>>with:name:
| | 3.7% {1560ms} FM3MetaDescription>>createInstance
| | 3.6% {1532ms} FAMIXInvocation class(Behavior)>>new
| | 1.3% {544ms} FAMIXMethod>>initialize
| | 1.2% {528ms}
FAMIXMethod(FAMIXBehaviouralEntity)>>initialize
| 7.7% {3289ms} MSEImporter>>endDocument
| 7.7% {3289ms} FMRepository>>addAll:
| 7.7% {3281ms} FMRepository>>add:
| 7.7% {3281ms} IdentitySet(Set)>>add:
| 7.2% {3048ms} IdentitySet>>scanFor:
| 7.1% {3028ms} primitives
2.9% {1243ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAddAll:
2.9% {1229ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAdd:
2.0% {838ms} MooseModel>>add:
1.6% {700ms} MooseModel(MooseAbstractGroup)>>add:
1.6% {678ms} MooseGroupRuntimeStorage>>add:
1.6% {670ms} MooseGroupRuntimeStorage>>updateCacheFor:
**Leaves**
22.8% {9667ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
11.0% {4677ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
7.5% {3195ms} IdentitySet>>scanFor:
4.0% {1701ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
3.8% {1624ms} ByteString(String)>>=
2.5% {1073ms} FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
2.2% {935ms} PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
2.1% {897ms} FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
2.1% {880ms} FMMultivalueLink>>do:
2.1% {876ms} WriteStream>>nextPut:
1.6% {670ms} FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
1.4% {594ms} Array class(SequenceableCollection class)>>new:streamContents:
1.4% {592ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>reject:
1.3% {543ms} FMFutureAttribute>>with:name:
1.2% {523ms} SmallInteger(ProtoObject)>>~~
1.2% {497ms} ByteString(String)>>hash
**Memory**
old +110,336,532 bytes
young +169,672 bytes
used +110,506,204 bytes
free -699,236 bytes
**GCs**
full 10 totalling 3,122ms (7.0% uptime), avg 312.0ms
incr 3216 totalling 17,586ms (41.0% uptime), avg 5.0ms
tenures 2,480 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
3:41 p.m.
New subject: Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Producing less garbage speeds it up
MooseModel>addNoAnnounce: anElement
self entityStorage add: anElement.
self privateState flushGroups.
anElement privateSetMooseModel: self.
^anElement
MooseModel>silentlyAddAll: entities
entities do: [:each | self addNoAnnounce: each].
^entities
- 66218 tallies, 66280 msec.
**Tree**
--------------------------------
Process: (40s) Morphic UI Process: nil
--------------------------------
44.9% {29736ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:
|44.8% {29722ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:withMetamodel:
| 44.8% {29714ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>run
| 44.8% {29714ms} FMMSEParser>>run
| 44.8% {29714ms} FMMSEParser>>basicRun
| 44.8% {29714ms} FMMSEParser>>Document
| 44.5% {29506ms} FMMSEParser>>Element
| 31.3% {20727ms} FMMSEParser>>Attribute
| |11.8% {7827ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>endAttribute:
| | |11.8% {7819ms} FMFutureElement>>endAttribute:
| | | 11.8% {7811ms} FMFutureAttribute>>endAttribute:
| | | 11.8% {7795ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 6.4% {4250ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |6.3% {4154ms}
FAMIXFileAnchor(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 6.2% {4130ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | 1.8% {1175ms}
FAMIXLocalVariable(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | |1.8% {1171ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | 1.8% {1167ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.7% {1107ms} primitives
| | | | 1.4% {951ms}
FAMIXMethod(FAMIXBehaviouralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | |1.4% {951ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | 1.4% {945ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.3% {839ms} primitives
| | | | 1.3% {879ms} FAMIXInvocation>>receiver:
| | | | 1.3% {879ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | 1.3% {831ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | 1.2% {817ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | 1.2% {811ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | 1.2% {811ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.2% {811ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.1% {723ms} primitives
| | | 5.3% {3489ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.9% {1291ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| | | |1.6% {1089ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
| | | | 1.3% {861ms} FMMultivalueLink>>do:
| | | | 1.1% {743ms} primitives
| | | 1.9% {1289ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| |7.8% {5141ms} FMMSEParser>>tNAME
| | |6.2% {4122ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | | 4.8% {3201ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | |4.4% {2913ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | 4.3% {2863ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | | 4.2% {2811ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | 4.2% {2769ms} primitives
| | | 1.3% {847ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | 1.2% {763ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | 1.1% {755ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | 1.1% {751ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.1% {745ms} primitives
| |7.6% {5043ms} FMMSEParser>>Value
| | |4.7% {3107ms} FMMSEParser>>Reference
| | | |3.0% {1958ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| | | | |1.9% {1275ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | | | 1.7% {1127ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | | 1.7% {1111ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | | 1.6% {1093ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.6% {1071ms} primitives
| | | |1.1% {721ms}
MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>referenceNumber:
| | | | 1.1% {715ms} FMFutureAttribute>>referenceNumber:
| | |2.4% {1610ms} FMMSEParser>>Primitive
| | | 1.9% {1233ms} FMMSEParser>>Number
| | | 1.1% {741ms} Character>>isDigit
| |3.2% {2150ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginAttribute:
| | 3.2% {2126ms} FMFutureElement>>beginAttribute:
| | 2.7% {1806ms} PhexMatcher>>beTrue
| | 2.6% {1756ms} PhexMatcher>>true
| | 2.5% {1678ms}
PhexMatcher>>expectedUnknownMessageToReturn:
| | 1.4% {925ms} Array(Collection)>>copyWithout:
| | |1.3% {891ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>reject:
| | 1.1% {721ms}
PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
| 7.9% {5213ms} FMMSEParser>>Serial
| |6.4% {4236ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>serial:
| | |6.4% {4226ms} FMFutureElement>>serial:
| | | 6.4% {4222ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>assign:to:
| | | 5.5% {3617ms} FMDanglingReference>>resolve:
| | | 4.5% {2979ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 2.7% {1760ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |2.5% {1688ms}
FAMIXInvocation(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 2.5% {1656ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | 1.1% {759ms}
FAMIXLocalVariable(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | 1.1% {759ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.8% {1187ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| |1.2% {819ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| 2.5% {1672ms} FMMSEParser>>tFULLNAME
| |1.9% {1275ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | 1.7% {1105ms} Character>>isLetter
| | 1.5% {991ms} Character>>characterSet
| | 1.5% {977ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | 1.4% {961ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | 1.4% {937ms} primitives
| 2.4% {1565ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginElement:
| 2.3% {1523ms} FMFutureElement class>>with:name:
| 2.3% {1513ms} FMFutureElement>>with:name:
| 2.1% {1361ms} FM3MetaDescription>>createInstance
| 2.0% {1313ms} FAMIXInvocation class(Behavior)>>new
1.2% {763ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAddAll:
1.1% {749ms} MooseModel>>addNoAnnounce:
--------------------------------
Process: other processes
--------------------------------
43.4% {28751ms} InputEventFetcher>>eventLoop
43.4% {28751ms} InputEventFetcher>>waitForInput
10.1% {6724ms} Semaphore>>waitTimeoutMSecs:
10.1% {6724ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
**Leaves**
43.4% {28751ms} InputEventFetcher>>waitForInput
11.3% {7489ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
10.1% {6724ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
5.5% {3615ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
1.9% {1273ms} ByteSymbol(String)>>=
1.8% {1175ms} FMMultivalueLink>>do:
1.6% {1073ms} PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
1.2% {787ms} WriteStream>>nextPut:
1.0% {677ms} UndefinedObject(ProtoObject)>>~~
1.0% {671ms} FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
**Memory**
old +167,772,160 bytes
young -167,290,864 bytes
used +481,296 bytes
free +167,290,864 bytes
**GCs**
full 9 totalling 36,946ms (56.0% uptime), avg 4105.0ms
incr 3179 totalling 13,809ms (21.0% uptime), avg 4.0ms
tenures 7,162,840 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
3:56 p.m.
New subject: Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
this is interesting
now I would be curious to understand why spur gc is more busy.
Stef
Le 24/1/16 15:40, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
Producing less garbage speeds it up
MooseModel>addNoAnnounce: anElement
self entityStorage add: anElement.
self privateState flushGroups.
anElement privateSetMooseModel: self.
^anElement
MooseModel>silentlyAddAll: entities
entities do: [:each | self addNoAnnounce: each].
^entities
- 66218 tallies, 66280 msec.
**Tree**
--------------------------------
Process: (40s) Morphic UI Process: nil
--------------------------------
44.9% {29736ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:
|44.8% {29722ms} MooseModel class>>importFrom:withMetamodel:
| 44.8% {29714ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>run
| 44.8% {29714ms} FMMSEParser>>run
| 44.8% {29714ms} FMMSEParser>>basicRun
| 44.8% {29714ms} FMMSEParser>>Document
| 44.5% {29506ms} FMMSEParser>>Element
| 31.3% {20727ms} FMMSEParser>>Attribute
| |11.8% {7827ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>endAttribute:
| | |11.8% {7819ms} FMFutureElement>>endAttribute:
| | | 11.8% {7811ms} FMFutureAttribute>>endAttribute:
| | | 11.8% {7795ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 6.4% {4250ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |6.3% {4154ms}
FAMIXFileAnchor(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 6.2% {4130ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | 1.8% {1175ms}
FAMIXLocalVariable(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | |1.8% {1171ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | 1.8% {1167ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.7% {1159ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.7% {1107ms} primitives
| | | | 1.4% {951ms}
FAMIXMethod(FAMIXBehaviouralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | |1.4% {951ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | | 1.4% {945ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.4% {939ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.3% {839ms} primitives
| | | | 1.3% {879ms} FAMIXInvocation>>receiver:
| | | | 1.3% {879ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | 1.3% {831ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | 1.2% {817ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | 1.2% {811ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | 1.2% {811ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.2% {811ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.1% {723ms} primitives
| | | 5.3% {3489ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.9% {1291ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifNone:
| | | |1.6% {1089ms}
FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
| | | | 1.3% {861ms} FMMultivalueLink>>do:
| | | | 1.1% {743ms} primitives
| | | 1.9% {1289ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| |7.8% {5141ms} FMMSEParser>>tNAME
| | |6.2% {4122ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | | 4.8% {3201ms} Character>>isLetter
| | | |4.4% {2913ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | 4.3% {2863ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | 4.2% {2811ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | 4.2% {2769ms} primitives
| | | 1.3% {847ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | 1.2% {763ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | 1.1% {755ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | | 1.1% {751ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.1% {745ms} primitives
| |7.6% {5043ms} FMMSEParser>>Value
| | |4.7% {3107ms} FMMSEParser>>Reference
| | | |3.0% {1958ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| | | | |1.9% {1275ms} Character>>isDigit
| | | | | 1.7% {1127ms} Character>>characterSet
| | | | | 1.7% {1111ms} EncodedCharSet
class>>charsetAt:
| | | | | 1.6% {1093ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | | | | 1.6% {1071ms} primitives
| | | |1.1% {721ms}
MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>referenceNumber:
| | | | 1.1% {715ms}
FMFutureAttribute>>referenceNumber:
| | |2.4% {1610ms} FMMSEParser>>Primitive
| | | 1.9% {1233ms} FMMSEParser>>Number
| | | 1.1% {741ms} Character>>isDigit
| |3.2% {2150ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginAttribute:
| | 3.2% {2126ms} FMFutureElement>>beginAttribute:
| | 2.7% {1806ms} PhexMatcher>>beTrue
| | 2.6% {1756ms} PhexMatcher>>true
| | 2.5% {1678ms}
PhexMatcher>>expectedUnknownMessageToReturn:
| | 1.4% {925ms} Array(Collection)>>copyWithout:
| | |1.3% {891ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>reject:
| | 1.1% {721ms}
PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
| 7.9% {5213ms} FMMSEParser>>Serial
| |6.4% {4236ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>serial:
| | |6.4% {4226ms} FMFutureElement>>serial:
| | | 6.4% {4222ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>assign:to:
| | | 5.5% {3617ms} FMDanglingReference>>resolve:
| | | 4.5% {2979ms} FMFutureAttribute>>maybeEnd
| | | 2.7% {1760ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:values:
| | | |2.5% {1688ms}
FAMIXInvocation(Object)>>mmSetProperty:to:
| | | | 2.5% {1656ms}
FM3PropertyDescription>>setOn:rawValue:
| | | | 1.1% {759ms}
FAMIXLocalVariable(FAMIXStructuralEntity)>>declaredType:
| | | | 1.1% {759ms} FMMultivalueLink
class>>on:update:from:to:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
FMMultivalueLink>>unsafeAdd:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>includes:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:ifAbsent:
| | | | 1.1% {739ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
| | | 1.8% {1187ms}
FM3MetaDescription>>attributeNamed:ifAbsent:
| |1.2% {819ms} FMMSEParser>>Identifier
| 2.5% {1672ms} FMMSEParser>>tFULLNAME
| |1.9% {1275ms} Character>>isAlphaNumeric
| | 1.7% {1105ms} Character>>isLetter
| | 1.5% {991ms} Character>>characterSet
| | 1.5% {977ms} EncodedCharSet class>>charsetAt:
| | 1.4% {961ms}
Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
| | 1.4% {937ms} primitives
| 2.4% {1565ms} MSEImporter(FMImporter)>>beginElement:
| 2.3% {1523ms} FMFutureElement class>>with:name:
| 2.3% {1513ms} FMFutureElement>>with:name:
| 2.1% {1361ms} FM3MetaDescription>>createInstance
| 2.0% {1313ms} FAMIXInvocation class(Behavior)>>new
1.2% {763ms} MooseModel>>silentlyAddAll:
1.1% {749ms} MooseModel>>addNoAnnounce:
--------------------------------
Process: other processes
--------------------------------
43.4% {28751ms} InputEventFetcher>>eventLoop
43.4% {28751ms} InputEventFetcher>>waitForInput
10.1% {6724ms} Semaphore>>waitTimeoutMSecs:
10.1% {6724ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
**Leaves**
43.4% {28751ms} InputEventFetcher>>waitForInput
11.3% {7489ms} Array(SequenceableCollection)>>at:ifAbsent:
10.1% {6724ms} DelayWaitTimeout>>wait
5.5% {3615ms}
OrderedCollection(SequenceableCollection)>>indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent:
1.9% {1273ms} ByteSymbol(String)>>=
1.8% {1175ms} FMMultivalueLink>>do:
1.6% {1073ms} PhexMatcher>>expect:describeShould:describeShouldNot:
1.2% {787ms} WriteStream>>nextPut:
1.0% {677ms} UndefinedObject(ProtoObject)>>~~
1.0% {671ms} FMMultivalueLink(Collection)>>detect:ifFound:ifNone:
**Memory**
old +167,772,160 bytes
young -167,290,864 bytes
used +481,296 bytes
free +167,290,864 bytes
**GCs**
full 9 totalling 36,946ms (56.0% uptime), avg 4105.0ms
incr 3179 totalling 13,809ms (21.0% uptime), avg 4.0ms
tenures 7,162,840 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
8:58 p.m.
New subject: Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
On 24-01-16 15:40, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
Producing less garbage speeds it up
- 66218 tallies, 66280 msec.
Hmm, can't reproduce it. It is now again just about as slow as it was.
Stephan
9:20 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi Vincent,
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
memory 160,432,128 bytes
old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
bugs in computing uptime).
The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
volunteers.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU
<vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
Hi,
I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less the
same magnitude:
Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
504: 1 min 55
1175: 4 min 25
Well there is a delta...
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration (120
secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
But, there is a large difference in GC time:
504: not spur
**Memory**
old +144,822,000 bytes
young -8,293,660 bytes
used +136,528,340 bytes
free -104,186,788 bytes
**GCs**
full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1175: spur
**Memory**
old +0 bytes
young +340,048 bytes
used +340,048 bytes
free -340,048 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
20715.0ms
incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
Total GC time
504: 43 secs
1175: 176 secs
See the performance reports attached.
I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
[mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
Hi,
I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
- October 7:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
- yesterday:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like to
understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself, but
maybe it comes from somewhere else.
Cheers,
Doru
before and
after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before Spur)
and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
On Jan
24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
Cheers,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it loads
twice as
slow with Spur than before:
- PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
- Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
Here is the reference file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
And here is the script:
[
MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
(FileSystem
workingDirectory / 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' /
'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
] timeToRun
Do you get the same?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
that makes the solution obvious."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt> 
9:26 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for looking at this.
Please let us know what support you need, or what kind of experiments we can do on our
side.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
memory 160,432,128 bytes
old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
bugs in computing uptime).
The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
volunteers.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU
<vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
Hi,
I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less the
same magnitude:
Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
504: 1 min 55
1175: 4 min 25
Well there is a delta...
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration (120
secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
But, there is a large difference in GC time:
504: not spur
**Memory**
old +144,822,000 bytes
young -8,293,660 bytes
used +136,528,340 bytes
free -104,186,788 bytes
**GCs**
full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1175: spur
**Memory**
old +0 bytes
young +340,048 bytes
used +340,048 bytes
free -340,048 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
20715.0ms
incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
Total GC time
504: 43 secs
1175: 176 secs
See the performance reports attached.
I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
[mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
Hi,
I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
- October 7:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
- yesterday:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like to
understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself, but
maybe it comes from somewhere else.
Cheers,
Doru
before and
after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before Spur)
and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
On Jan
24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
Cheers,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it loads
twice as
slow with Spur than before:
- PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
- Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
Here is the reference file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
And here is the script:
[
MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
(FileSystem workingDirectory
/ 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
] timeToRun
Do you get the same?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
that makes the solution obvious."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt>
9:33 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for looking at this.
Please let us know what support you need, or what kind of experiments we
can do on our side.
What I want most of all is a test case that I can run on Mac. I'm assuming
that I can just copy the job that Vincent mentioned in his email and use
that as a test case. Do you see any issues with that? If so, how do I get
a really bug MOOSE test case to run on Mac?
Cheers,
Doru
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
memory 160,432,128 bytes
old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
bugs in computing uptime).
The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
volunteers.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU <
vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less
the
> same magnitude:
> Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
> Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
>
> However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
> 'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
> 504: 1 min 55
> 1175: 4 min 25
> Well there is a delta...
>
> After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration
(120
> secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
> But, there is a large difference in GC time:
>
> 504: not spur
> **Memory**
> old +144,822,000 bytes
> young -8,293,660 bytes
> used +136,528,340 bytes
> free -104,186,788 bytes
>
> **GCs**
> full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
> incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
> tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
> root table 0 overflows
>
> 1175: spur
> **Memory**
> old +0 bytes
> young +340,048 bytes
> used +340,048 bytes
> free -340,048 bytes
> **GCs**
> full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
> 20715.0ms
> incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
> tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
> root table 0 overflows
>
> Total GC time
> 504: 43 secs
> 1175: 176 secs
>
> See the performance reports attached.
>
> I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Vincent
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> [mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
> Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
> To: Moose-related development
> Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
>
> Hi,
>
> I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
> - October 7:
> https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
>
> - yesterday:
> https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
>
> Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like
to
> understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it
comes from Spur itself,
but
> maybe it comes from somewhere else.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>
>>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
> before and after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before
Spur)
> and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the
slowness may come from the
> difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
>>
>> I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it
loads
twice as
slow with Spur than before:
- PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
- Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
Here is the reference file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
And here is the script:
[
MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
(FileSystem workingDirectory
/ 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
] timeToRun
Do you get the same?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
that makes the solution obvious."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt>
9:42 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi Eliot,
I created a package to easily reproduce the problem:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/moose-6-for-GC-bug.zip
In there you will get:
- an image,
- the MSE file to be loaded, and
- a Playground script that loads that file.
On my Mac, this takes some 3 minutes, while before it took about 1 minute.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:33 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for looking at this.
Please let us know what support you need, or what kind of experiments we can do on our
side.
What I want most of all is a test case that I can run on Mac. I'm assuming that I
can just copy the job that Vincent mentioned in his email and use that as a test case. Do
you see any issues with that? If so, how do I get a really bug MOOSE test case to run on
Mac?
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
memory 160,432,128 bytes
old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
bugs in computing uptime).
The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
volunteers.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU
<vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
Hi,
I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less the
same magnitude:
Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
504: 1 min 55
1175: 4 min 25
Well there is a delta...
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration (120
secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
But, there is a large difference in GC time:
504: not spur
**Memory**
old +144,822,000 bytes
young -8,293,660 bytes
used +136,528,340 bytes
free -104,186,788 bytes
**GCs**
full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1175: spur
**Memory**
old +0 bytes
young +340,048 bytes
used +340,048 bytes
free -340,048 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
20715.0ms
incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
Total GC time
504: 43 secs
1175: 176 secs
See the performance reports attached.
I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
[mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
Hi,
I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
- October 7:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
- yesterday:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like to
understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself, but
maybe it comes from somewhere else.
Cheers,
Doru
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez
Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
before and
after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before Spur)
and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
Cheers,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it loads
twice as
slow with Spur than before:
- PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
- Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
Here is the reference file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
And here is the script:
[
MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
(FileSystem workingDirectory
/ 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
] timeToRun
Do you get the same?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
that makes the solution obvious."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt>
9:51 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
What's the system info on your Mac? Mine is "*Version* 10.9.5 *Processor*
2.2GHz Intel Core i7 *Memory* 16Gb 1333 MHz DDR3"
> Let me know if you need anything else.
> Cheers,
> Doru
> > On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:33 PM, Eliot
Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
> > > Hi Doru,
> > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:26 PM,
Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com
> wrote:
> > Hi Eliot,
> > > Thanks for looking at this.
> > > Please let us know what support you
need, or what kind of experiments we
> can do on our side.
> > > What I want most of all is a test case
that I can run on Mac. I'm
> assuming that I can just copy the job that Vincent mentioned in his email
> and use that as a test case. Do you see any issues with that? If so, how
> do I get a really bug MOOSE test case to run on Mac?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> > > On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > > Hi
Vincent,
> > > > >
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
> > > GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
> > > Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
> > > be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
> > > things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
> > > the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
> > > and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
> > > > > I do
want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
> > > scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
> > > algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
> > > what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
> > > > > memory
160,432,128 bytes
> > > old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
> > > young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
> > > used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
> > > free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
> > > GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
> > > full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
> > > incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
> > > tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
> > > > >
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
> > > transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
> > > bugs in computing uptime).
> > > > > The
plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
> > > into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
> > > GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
> > > mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
> > > one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
> > > pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
> > > this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
> > > volunteers.
> > > > >
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
> > > > >> On
Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU <
> vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
> > > > > >>
Hi,
> > > > > >> I
made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or
> less the
> > >> same magnitude:
> > >> Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
> > >> Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
> > > > > >>
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
> > >> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
> > >> 'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
> > >> 504: 1 min 55
> > >> 1175: 4 min 25
> > >> Well there is a delta...
> > > > > >>
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same
> duration (120
> > >> secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
> > >> But, there is a large difference in GC time:
> > > > > >>
504: not spur
> > >> **Memory**
> > >> old +144,822,000 bytes
> > >> young -8,293,660 bytes
> > >> used +136,528,340 bytes
> > >> free -104,186,788 bytes
> > > > > >>
**GCs**
> > >> full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
> > >> incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
> > >> tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
> > >> root table 0 overflows
> > > > > >>
1175: spur
> > >> **Memory**
> > >> old +0 bytes
> > >> young +340,048 bytes
> > >> used +340,048 bytes
> > >> free -340,048 bytes
> > >> **GCs**
> > >> full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
> > >> 20715.0ms
> > >> incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
> > >> tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
> > >> root table 0 overflows
> > > > > >>
Total GC time
> > >> 504: 43 secs
> > >> 1175: 176 secs
> > > > > >>
See the performance reports attached.
> > > > > >> I
let VM people take care of the issue ;)
> > > > > >>
Cheers,
> > >> Vincent
> > > > > >>
-----Original Message-----
> > >> From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> > >> [mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
> > >> Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
> > >> To: Moose-related development
> > >> Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
> > > > > >>
Hi,
> > > > > >> I
am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
> > >> - October 7:
> > >> https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
> > > > > >> -
yesterday:
> > >> https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
> > > > > >>
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would
> like to
> > >> understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself,
> but
> > >> maybe it comes from somewhere else.
> > > > > >>
Cheers,
> > >> Doru
> > > > > > > > >
> > >>>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianopeck(a)gmail.com > >
>>> wrote:
> > >> > >
>>> Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you
> said
> > >> before and after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before
> Spur)
> > >> and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
> > >> difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
> > >> > >
>>> Cheers,
> > >> > >
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com > wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >> > >
>>> I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
> > >> > >
>>> I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it
> loads
> > >> twice as slow with Spur than before:
> > >>> - PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
> > >>> - Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
> > >> > >
>>> Here is the reference file:
> > >> >
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
> > >> > >
>>> And here is the script:
> > >>> [
> > >>> MooseModel new
> > >>> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
> > >> readOnlyFileNamed:
> > >>> (FileSystem workingDirectory / 'src'
/
> > >> 'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
> > >>> ] timeToRun
> > >> > >
>>> Do you get the same?
> > >> > >
>>> Cheers,
> > >>> Doru
> > >> > >
>> > >
>>> --
> > >>> www.tudorgirba.com
> > >>> www.feenk.com
> > >> > >
>>> "Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
> > >>> that makes the solution obvious."
> > >> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Moose-dev mailing list
> > >>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> > >>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>> --
> > >>> Mariano
> > >>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Moose-dev mailing list
> > >>> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> > >>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> > > > > >>
--
> > >> www.tudorgirba.com
> > >> www.feenk.com
> > > > > >>
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
> > > > > >>
_______________________________________________
> > >> Moose-dev mailing list
> > >> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> > >> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
> > >> <report504.txt
> > >> <report1175.txt
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > _,,,^..^,,,_
> > best, Eliot
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moose-dev mailing list
> > Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
Hi Eliot,
I created a package to easily reproduce the problem:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/moose-6-for-GC-bug.zip
In there you will get:
- an image,
- the MSE file to be loaded, and
- a Playground script that loads that file.
That sounds perfect.
On my Mac, this takes some 3 minutes, while before it took about 1 minute.
10:14 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi,
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
I created a package to easily reproduce the problem:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/moose-6-for-GC-bug.zip
In there you will get:
- an image,
- the MSE file to be loaded, and
- a Playground script that loads that file.
That sounds perfect.
On my Mac, this takes some 3 minutes, while before it took about 1 minute.
What's the system info on your Mac? Mine is "Version 10.9.5 Processor 2.2GHz
Intel Core i7 Memory 16Gb 1333 MHz DDR3”
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro10,1
Processor Name: Intel Core i7
Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz
Number of Processors: 1
Total Number of Cores: 4
L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
L3 Cache: 6 MB
Memory: 16 GB
Boot ROM Version: MBP101.00EE.B0A
SMC Version (system): 2.3f36
Serial Number (system): C02JG3T5DKQ5
Hardware UUID: 1FF116A4-5040-53B2-A133-F95256DE6C94
Cheers,
Doru
Let me know if you need anything else.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:33 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for looking at this.
Please let us know what support you need, or what kind of experiments we can do on our
side.
What I want most of all is a test case that I can run on Mac. I'm assuming that I
can just copy the job that Vincent mentioned in his email and use that as a test case. Do
you see any issues with that? If so, how do I get a really bug MOOSE test case to run on
Mac?
Cheers,
Doru
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
memory 160,432,128 bytes
old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
bugs in computing uptime).
The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
volunteers.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU
<vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
Hi,
I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less the
same magnitude:
Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
504: 1 min 55
1175: 4 min 25
Well there is a delta...
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration (120
secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
But, there is a large difference in GC time:
504: not spur
**Memory**
old +144,822,000 bytes
young -8,293,660 bytes
used +136,528,340 bytes
free -104,186,788 bytes
**GCs**
full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1175: spur
**Memory**
old +0 bytes
young +340,048 bytes
used +340,048 bytes
free -340,048 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
20715.0ms
incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
Total GC time
504: 43 secs
1175: 176 secs
See the performance reports attached.
I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
[mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
Hi,
I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
- October 7:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
- yesterday:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like to
understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself, but
maybe it comes from somewhere else.
Cheers,
Doru
>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
before and after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before Spur)
and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
>
> I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it loads
twice as slow with Spur than before:
> - PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
> - Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
>
> Here is the reference file:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
>
> And here is the script:
> [
> MooseModel new
> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
> (FileSystem workingDirectory / 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
> ] timeToRun
>
> Do you get the same?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
> that makes the solution obvious."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt>
11:35 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
I created a package to easily reproduce the problem:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/moose-6-for-GC-bug.zip
In there you will get:
- an image,
- the MSE file to be loaded, and
- a Playground script that loads that file.
I take it that this is a Spur image. t would be great to have both a Spur
and a V3 mage to compare, as similar as is easily achievable. But as long
as there's both a V3 and a Spur image...
On my Mac, this takes some 3 minutes, while before it took about 1 minute.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Cheers,
Doru
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:33 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for looking at this.
Please let us know what support you need, or what kind of experiments we
can do on
our side.
What I want most of all is a test case that I can run on Mac. I'm
assuming
that I can just copy the job that Vincent mentioned in his email
and use that as a test case. Do you see any issues with that? If so, how
do I get a really bug MOOSE test case to run on Mac?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
> GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
> Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
> be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
> things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
> the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
> and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
>
> I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
> scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
> algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
> what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
>
> memory 160,432,128 bytes
> old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
> young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
> used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
> free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
> GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
> full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
> incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
> tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
>
> (There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
> transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
> bugs in computing uptime).
>
> The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
> into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
> GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
> mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
> one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
> pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
> this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
> volunteers.
>
> _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
>
>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU <
vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or
less
the
>> same magnitude:
>> Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
>> Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
>>
>> However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
>> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
>> 'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
>> 504: 1 min 55
>> 1175: 4 min 25
>> Well there is a delta...
>>
>> After investigation, the standard process has almost the same
duration
(120
>> secs for prespur and 140 secs for
spur).
>> But, there is a large difference in GC time:
>>
>> 504: not spur
>> **Memory**
>> old +144,822,000 bytes
>> young -8,293,660 bytes
>> used +136,528,340 bytes
>> free -104,186,788 bytes
>>
>> **GCs**
>> full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
>> incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
>> tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
>> root table 0 overflows
>>
>> 1175: spur
>> **Memory**
>> old +0 bytes
>> young +340,048 bytes
>> used +340,048 bytes
>> free -340,048 bytes
>> **GCs**
>> full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
>> 20715.0ms
>> incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
>> tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
>> root table 0 overflows
>>
>> Total GC time
>> 504: 43 secs
>> 1175: 176 secs
>>
>> See the performance reports attached.
>>
>> I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Vincent
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
>> [mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
>> Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
>> To: Moose-related development
>> Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
>> - October 7:
>> https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
>>
>> - yesterday:
>> https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
>>
>> Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would
like
to
>> understand where the slowness comes.
Maybe it comes from Spur itself,
but
>> maybe it comes from somewhere else.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>>
>>>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you
said
>> before and after Spur, do you mean a
Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before
Spur)
>> and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise,
the slowness may come from the
>> difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
>>>
>>> I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it
loads
>> twice as slow with Spur than before:
>>> - PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
>>> - Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
>>>
>>> Here is the reference file:
>>>
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
>
> And here is the script:
> [
> MooseModel new
> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
> (FileSystem workingDirectory / 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
> ] timeToRun
>
> Do you get the same?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
> that makes the solution obvious."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt>
25 Jan
25 Jan
3:23 p.m.
New subject: [Pharo-dev] Spur Garbage collection takes 4 times more when loading MSE (WAS: mse loading looks slower :()
Hi Eliot,
Indeed, this was a Spur image. I will put together the same setup with a pre-Spur image
and get back to you.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 11:35 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
I created a package to easily reproduce the problem:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/moose-6-for-GC-bug.zip
In there you will get:
- an image,
- the MSE file to be loaded, and
- a Playground script that loads that file.
I take it that this is a Spur image. t would be great to have both a Spur and a V3 mage
to compare, as similar as is easily achievable. But as long as there's both a V3 and
a Spur image...
On my Mac, this takes some 3 minutes, while before it took about 1 minute.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:33 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Doru,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for looking at this.
Please let us know what support you need, or what kind of experiments we can do on our
side.
What I want most of all is a test case that I can run on Mac. I'm assuming that I
can just copy the job that Vincent mentioned in his email and use that as a test case. Do
you see any issues with that? If so, how do I get a really bug MOOSE test case to run on
Mac?
Cheers,
Doru
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jan 24, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda
<eliot.miranda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I'll take a look early this week. There's clearly a bug; the Spur
GC is /not/ collecting those dictionaries :-( (thanks Stephan!).
Assuming the bug is fixed times should come down (see below). It may
be that the bug in Slang that I introduced in December has broken
things because I don't see these symptoms in my daily work (but I use
the most up-to-date VM version possible ;-) ). But I'm not in denial
and look forward to using MOOSE as a good stress case.
I do want to say that the GC is not complete. Right now we have a
scavenger that works well, and a global GC that has a slow compaction
algorithm, and hence there are significant pauses. For example here's
what I see as typical in using SPur for VMMaker work:
memory 160,432,128 bytes
old 153,658,624 bytes (95.8%)
young 4,838,224 bytes (3%)
used 127,009,928 bytes (79.2%)
free 28,126,456 bytes (17.5%)
GCs 7,265 (?? ms between GCs)
full 36 totalling 13,229 ms (0% uptime), avg 367.5 ms
incr 7,229 totalling 6,546 ms (0% uptime), avg 0.9 ms
tenures 3,589,063 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
(There's no uptime in the above stats because we're still
transitioning Squeak to the 64-bit clock and there are consequently
bugs in computing uptime).
The plan is to add an incremental global GC so this work is broken up
into much smaller pieces. I don't want to see 700ms pauses in global
GC; one can't do game animation with that. So an incremental
mark-sweep is needed. There are two nice papers we're considering,
one from Lua and one for a truly concurrent collector. But time is
pressing, so if anyone out there knows GC and is interested in helping
this is a nicely self-contained project for which we'd love to have
volunteers.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Vincent BLONDEAU
<vincent.blondeau(a)polytech-lille.net> wrote:
Hi,
I made the benchmarks with the files you provided. I have more or less the
same magnitude:
Version 504: 0:00:01:09.021
Version 1175: 0:00:02:37.507
However, by launching it in the time profiler (MooseModel new
importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream readOnlyFileNamed:
'd:/ArgoUML-0-34.mse')), it takes
504: 1 min 55
1175: 4 min 25
Well there is a delta...
After investigation, the standard process has almost the same duration (120
secs for prespur and 140 secs for spur).
But, there is a large difference in GC time:
504: not spur
**Memory**
old +144,822,000 bytes
young -8,293,660 bytes
used +136,528,340 bytes
free -104,186,788 bytes
**GCs**
full 1 totalling 965ms (1.0% uptime), avg 965.0ms
incr 3264 totalling 42,279ms (33.0% uptime), avg 13.0ms
tenures 2,497 (avg 1 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
1175: spur
**Memory**
old +0 bytes
young +340,048 bytes
used +340,048 bytes
free -340,048 bytes
**GCs**
full 7 totalling 145,003ms (66.0% uptime), avg
20715.0ms
incr 3288 totalling 30,912ms (14.0% uptime), avg 9.0ms
tenures 7,146,505 (avg 0 GCs/tenure)
root table 0 overflows
Total GC time
504: 43 secs
1175: 176 secs
See the performance reports attached.
I let VM people take care of the issue ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
-----Original Message-----
From: moose-dev-bounces(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
[mailto:moose-dev-bounces@list.inf.unibe.ch] On Behalf Of Tudor Girba
Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 09:08
To: Moose-related development
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: mse loading looks slower :(
Hi,
I am talking about the difference between Moose 6 images:
- October 7:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/504/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
- yesterday:
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/1175/artifact/moose-6.0.zip
Multiple things did change, but not in Moose. In the end, I would like to
understand where the slowness comes. Maybe it comes from Spur itself, but
maybe it comes from somewhere else.
Cheers,
Doru
>> On Jan 24, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Doru...just to be sure it is not a Pharo (image change), when you said
before and after Spur, do you mean a Pharo 5.0 exactly (just before Spur)
and a Pharo JUST after it? Otherwise, the slowness may come from the
difference between the 2 Pharos you are running.
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing some performance testing of Moose with the Spur VM on Mac.
>
> I tried to load an MSE file with ArgoUML 0.34 and on my machine it loads
twice as slow with Spur than before:
> - PreSpur: 0:00:01:07.272
> - Spur: 0:00:02:10.508
>
> Here is the reference file:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18323746/Tmp/ArgoUML-0-34.mse.zip
>
> And here is the script:
> [
> MooseModel new
> importFromMSEStream: (StandardFileStream
readOnlyFileNamed:
> (FileSystem workingDirectory / 'src' /
'ArgoUML-0-34' / 'ArgoUML-0-34.mse') fullName).
> ] timeToRun
>
> Do you get the same?
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Problem solving should be focused on describing the problem in a way
> that makes the solution obvious."
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
<report504.txt>
<report1175.txt>
3008
days inactive
3009
days old
12 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Eliot Miranda -
Stephan Eggermont -
stepharo -
Tudor Girba -
Vincent BLONDEAU