On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone

> Op 25 apr. 2015 om 18:10 heeft Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <offray@riseup.net> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Thanks. The main issue for me with morphic is there is little information right now, except may be for [1] and the upcoming information from the Kilion chapter/document. I will take a look to Spec, which seems to have the most updated/complete documentation now and get a feeling of it and come back with findings/inquiries.

That won't really help you. Spec is mapped to Morphic.

Having more stuff under Spec than Morphic would help with the interface. There is a lot of mess, but there is also continued effort to clean it up and make it work as it should.

But in principle nothing should really be stopping you (imho) from writing GlamourAdapter between Spec and Glamour just like it is done for Morphic.

Unless you are doing something really specific and want very tight control over things (e.g. Spotter) Spec should be the go-to choice.

1. A explicit menu with submenus on top of the browser windows (not hidden behind the dots like now).
2. Better icons and a tool bar.

Spec has support for this

also look at

ApplicationWithToolbar new openWithSpec

3. A contextual menu in each node of the tree for actions on that node.

This can be also done

look at TreeModel, and ListModel; both have class-side examples.

Peter