Are you going to maintain 2 versions of a force based layout? My guess is that the answer to that is no. I would replace the old one with the optimized version.
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
> On Dec 8, 2015, at 19:29, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
>
> Well… If something care about creating a stable and development version. Then sure, why not…
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Ferlicot D. Cyril <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Le 08/12/2015 22:24, Alexandre Bergel a écrit :
>>>> So why create a new class instead of updating the existing one?
>>>
>>> Because I have not tested it enough. Moreover, I feel this may impact the continuous layout one may have.
>>>
>>> Inspect the following expression:
>>> RTGeneralExample new forceBasedLayout
>>>
>>> The optimized layout may not be efficient here.
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>>
>>
>> IMO this is why we have stable/development version for a project. If we
>> decide that it is stable nobody have to change it and during the
>> development phase everyone can test it/improve it without problem using
>> the development version of Roassal.
>> But this is just my opinion :)
>>
>> --
>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>
>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>
>> 165 Avenue Bretagne
>> Lille 59000 France
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
>> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
>
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev