Hi Abdelghani,

You can have a look at my slides. http://www.lifl.fr/~etien/Lucene/testMaintenance.html (page is in French, but slides in English)
I don’t do the visualisation in these slides because Nicolas does. But you can see that I try to see what are the smells or critics that I want to highlight in a software that I do not know.

Sincerely,
Anne




Le 16 févr. 2017 à 12:08, Abdelghani Alidra <alidrandco@yahoo.fr> a écrit :

Hi Nicolas,


On 15 Feb 2017, at 12:00, moose-dev-request@list.inf.unibe.ch wrote:

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:10:54 +0100
From: Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil@inria.fr>
To: Moose-related development <moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>
Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: software reingineering guidelines
Message-ID: <f856fa35-917e-0a5a-a84c-41d89ebe83ac@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi Abdou,

not that I know of.
Moose provides the tools, the engineers must provide the "intelligence", 
the processus to extract needed informatino.

We currently have a project with Master students along these lines, but 
they did not deliver it yet, so no experience result yet neither.

I was thinking that people from Synectic (for instance) could have some valuable experience in this field (where to start from, a list of what to look for, how to look for it, the different reports, …)

We recommended using Roassal (and explained how to use it) to try to get 
an understanding of the “architecture”
Yes, and use the queries to gets different metrics about the projects. maybe detect some (anti) patterns...

Actually, asking them to explain HOW they got their results (As well as 
WHAT results they got) could be interesting

Definitely, this is part of the objectives too :)
Maybe we could produce a sorte of practical guide to code analysis with Moose.

nicolas

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev