But I just noticed that opening a distributionMap is very very very long! (whereas in my old image with an old version of moose, with the same model, it was nearly instantaneous).

2010/8/17 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com>

No stress, I just wanted to give feedback :).

But, it would make sense to get some of the work you are doing on the custom report in Arki. So, if you feel that something needs improvement, just raise the point or just commit. One thing I would like to make sure is that what you do works out of the box with the rest of the system.

Cheers,
Doru

On 17 Aug 2010, at 14:17, Cyrille Delaunay wrote:

Oups, it was a mistake. I shouldn't saved those changes.
Removing the error checking was for debuging and all other changes are now saved in another package.
So don't take into account this commit. Am I able to remove it from squeaksource by myself ?
Sorry

2010/8/17 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba@gmail.com>
Hi Cyrille,

I noticed a recent commit in Arki-Reporter. It would be nice to get your efforts in this repository, but in this case, the commit is wrong:
1. you removed REPConcernSpecification class>>open (is this by any chance due to the overriding problem?)
2. you removed the error checking of the result computation which can easily break the whole report

Could you please take a look?

Cheers,
Doru

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"We are all great at making mistakes."

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev