Hi,

We are very happy that you are all waiting for MooseQuery integration. We didn’t know that we could integrate it.

I have currently some personal problems to manage and so I am not very available. Next week, I will be at ICSME (with the workshops, there will be 4 papers about software evolution analysis, with Moose or Pharo).
Jean-Christophe has a new associate professor position in Brest and so is not very available neither.

We should be able to do the integration before the middle of Octobre.
Sorry for the delays.

Cheers,

Anne

Le 22 sept. 2015 à 22:51, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> a écrit :

Yes, MooseQuery should be integrated now. I am waiting for that :)

Doru

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
> So outgoingInvocation should normally give methods,

Shouldn’t it return invocations? It would be surprising that it return methods.

> This is what the new MooseQuery solves with the two scoping selectors that Anne mentionned

Yes, I had a look at MooseQuery, and apparently it deserves to be in the image.

Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



--

"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev