> > So, I looked at the code a bit. We should integrate this as soon as
> > possible.
> >
> > However, first we need to address a couple of issues:
> > - the traversing of parents like described above
>
> As explained above, we disagree.
>
> > - there should be no need for the <parentMetaClass:> annotation. This is
> > derived from the parentSelector
> > - the parentSelector annotation should be moved to the method that defines
> > the property. Also, we should prefix it with MSE and I would call it
> > ParentScope. So, something like this: FAMIXType>>container
> > <MSEProperty: #container type: #FAMIXContainerEntity opposite: #types>
> > <MSEComment: 'Container entity to which this type belongs to. Container is
> > a namespace, not a package (Smalltalk).'>
> > *<MSEParentScope>*
> > ^container

We have just tried to do it. However it is not possible to move
parentSelector annotation to the method that defines the property.
Indeed, for example FAMIXClass and FAMIXMethod have two parentSelector
among which parentPackage that is inherited from FAMIXNamedEntity. For
the other classes inheriting from FAMIXNamedEntity parentPackage is not
a parentSelector. Therefore it is not possible to put the annotations on
the method itself.

Nevertheless, we will remove parentMetaClass annotation as you
suggested.

Anne & JC

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev