Hi,

It seems that Metacello does not consider PackageName-xyz and PacakgeName-BranchName-xyz as the same package. I suspect it because when I look at the packages loaded by two different configurations with and without branch names as package name suffixes are not the same. Could someone knowing the internals of Metacello confirm it?

So, here is a log of Metacello of the loadDirective for ConfigOfGlamour with and without packages with branch names. I have truncated the output to highlight important parts of the log.

----------- Metacello log follows ----------------------

Without branching (Rubric and Glamour-Morphic-Renderer loaded only once):

linear load : 

atomic load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]

linear load : 3.1.3.Moose51 [ConfigurationOfGlamourCore]

atomic load : 1.2.14.Moose51 [ConfigurationOfRubric]

load : Rubric-AndreiChis.207

                            load : Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-AndreiChis.324

linear load : 1.13 [ConfigurationOfRoassal2]

linear load : 3.1.4 [ConfigurationOfGlamourCore]

With branching (old versions overwrites the fixes):

What it actually changes is packages with branch name are overwritten with their predecessors and hence fixes are not correctly included in the resulting image. It seems that ensuring correct loading in the presence of branched packages requires no other configuration is loading previous versions of the branched packages.