I am not sure what you are replying to. I understand what you need and I simply pointed out what I think the alternatives are.

If you take the second alternative, it implies significant changes to the way the clients of metrics work with those metrics. But, it can be interesting nevertheless.

Doru


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
In certain situations, we need to display metrics with meaningful labels in the browsers and in that case, showing selector names does not look good.
With proposed framework, we'll have the objects knowing their labels and know how to compute their units.




On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,

Nice project.

You should probably take into consideration that FM3PropertyDescription is an object representing a property. For example:
   class := FAMIXClass new numberOfLinesOfCode: 42.
   loc := class mooseDescription allAttributes detect: [ :each | each name = #numberOfLinesOfCode ].
   class mmGetProperty: loc
   ==> 42

A possible route would be to add extra constraints (for example related to the type) to this object.

Another option would be to have the numberOfLinesOfCode method return a linesOfText unit. This implies that code like:
   group inject: 0 into: [:sum :each | sum + each numberOfLinesOfCode]
would break. We can live with this and fix the breaking places, but it should be a thing to consider.

Cheers,
Doru

 


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Guillaume Larcheveque <guillaume.larcheveque@gmail.com> wrote:
Currently, there is no object in my knowledge to represent a metric in Moose. I would like to have this kind of object to ask it for example the name of the metric, a description, the associated selector...

Ideally this object should have the same behaviour than Unit framework; it should resolve units for example if you divide number of bugs by lines of code, you should get numberOfBugs.linesOfCode^(-1); then if you multiply this by line of code to get the estimated average value you get numberOfBugs...

If I missed an existing implementation close to this, thank you very much in advance to indicate me otherwise I will create a project for this and you are welcome to contribute.

--
Guillaume Larcheveque


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev



_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev




--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"