Hi,

I finally isolated a sample from an MSE generated with inFAMIX:

((FAMIX.JavaSourceLanguage)

(FAMIX.Class (id: 773130)

(sourceAnchor (ref: 927058))

(parentPackage (ref: 773123))

(container (ref: 773125))

(name 'AbstractDataDom')

(isAbstract true)

)

(FAMIX.ParameterizedType (id: 773536)

(parameterizableClass (ref: 773130))

))

Importing this MSE will generate the error. The point is that the FAMIXClass should be a FAMIXParameterizableClass instead. In fact this manually corrected MSE works:

((FAMIX.JavaSourceLanguage)

(FAMIX.ParameterizableClass (id: 773130)

(sourceAnchor (ref: 927058))

(parentPackage (ref: 773123))

(container (ref: 773125))

(name 'AbstractDataDom')

(isAbstract true)

)

(FAMIX.ParameterizedType (id: 773536)

(parameterizableClass (ref: 773130))

))

the class is defined as:

public abstract class AbstractDataDom<D extends DTOBase, A> extends AbstractDom {

Maybe I'm using an old version of inFamix (it should be from mid this year), I will download a new one and I will try again.

Cheers,

Fabrizio

2013/9/9 Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>

I have the feeling that this will happen to any generic class in your code.

Doru

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fabrizio Perin <fabrizio.perin@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Doru,

I tried to collect from the big MSE file only those elements which are suppose to be responsible for the error. I check the name of the entities in the debugger when it pop up. So far by importing only those elements the error doesn't pop up, i will try again on monday.

Cheers,

Fabrizio

2013/9/7 Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>

Hi,

The code as it is now is correct in Moose. If I understand correctly, the issue is in inFamix. Did you manage to reproduce on a smaller case study?

Cheers,

Doru

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Fabrizio Perin <fabrizio.perin@gmail.com> wrote:

yes I'm trying to setup a fake mse to reproduce my problem. As soon as it is done i will commit the test.

cheers,

Fabrizio

2013/9/6 Diego Lont <diego.lont@delware.nl>

Then we should ask Doru, for he has made some changes, that breaks your code. And maybe you can write a test that shows your problem?

On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Fabrizio Perin wrote:

Hello,

just tried, still happen.

For me only 72 seems to be working. I will let you know a soon as the import is done (if it will finish :) )

cheers,

Fabrizio

2013/9/6 Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl>

Could you try with .76?
Problem could also be in 74.
Working on our presentation for monday,
no time to look into it deeply now.

Stephan & Diego

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--

www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev