On 18 nov. 2009, at 12:39, Simon Denier wrote:
On 17 nov. 2009, at 12:15, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Dear List,
MondrianPaintings is a package belonging to the Mondrian repository that contains few classes apparently to compute cycles, render a distribution map, and render some views related to Flair.
Problem is we never really discussed what this MondrianPaintings is about. I understand it as a bunch of applications based on Mondrian, more complex than basic stuff, and independent of Moose.
But it still a bit in the gray.
There is a number of problems with this package:
- It contains too few tests. Among the 9 test run, 4 raise an error. Apparently CollectionExtensions is required, which belongs to Moose. Mondrian cannot depends on Moose. Maybe CollectionExtensions may be moved into a standalone package for which both Mondrian and Moose can depend on.
- MOSmalltalkPaintings>>viewWAPackageHierarchy depends on WAPackage which is not present in Mondrian and in a Dev image
yes this is viz for seaside packages
What should we do with this package? We could move it to Moose, but identifying cycles is an interesting feature that go beyond Moose. As far as a I can see, making CollectionExtensions an independent package looks the best compromise.
Actually this package does not contain any cycle identification algo (there are in MooseAlgos and DSM for now), it's just stand-alone visualizations in which you can put data.
Fixed. I actually move the cycle tables and layer tables classes to MooseAlgos. Please test.
I agree that CollectionExtensions should have its own project.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
--
Simon