Hi,
Looks cool.- I would put the drop-down list with classes on top, seem to be strange to read from the bottom.
- Editing a production does not seem to work. The method definition disappears and graph and example are broken.
- I missed production protocols already in the old browser.
- The start production is somehow missing in the list.
- Also useful would be a static tree with the references in the leaves
- Inspecting a parse result inspects a GLMMultiValue.
- There should be a button to expand the debug trace, at least to a given level.
Below my suggestion for the remove-production refactoring:
remove: aSymbol in: aClass| references |references := aClass new productionNames valuesintersection: (aClass whichSelectorsReallyRead: aSymbol).references notEmpty ifTrue: [(self confirm: 'The following production(s) refer to ' , aSymbol printString , ':' , String cr , ((references collect: [ :each | each printString ]) fold: [ :a :b | a , ', ' , b ]) , '. Really delete?')ifFalse: [ ^ self ] ].(aClass instVarNames includes: aSymbol)ifTrue: [ aClass removeInstVarNamed: aSymbol ].(aClass selectors includes: aSymbol)ifTrue: [ aClass removeSelector: aSymbol ]LukasOn 6 December 2011 22:53, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hi,I just wanted to let you know that I started to rework the PetitParser browser.There are several things that have changed:
- it is modular, currently being formed of 3 distinct browsers. To give them a try (I also attached a couple of screenshots):PPAllParsersBrowser open.PPParserBrowser openOn: PPArithmeticParser.PPParserInspector openOn: PPArithmeticParser new.- it only relies on the Glamour mechanisms without state in the implementation code. This was more of a validation that the engine is expressive enough- it has a slightly different layout- the Mondrian map can be used as a navigation, so clicking on a node will focus the browser on that production.- it uses a tree widget for the debugger so we can scale for large debugging tracesWhat is still to do:- install the associated instance variable for each newly created production.- introduce parser renaming refactoring. This would entail triggering both a method and an instance var rename.- add the possibility to remove a production. This would entail removing a method and the corresponding instance var.
- make the morph graph view interactive.- add a new grammar class.- integrate tests for each production. This would involve being able to browse tests associated to a production, run, add and remove them.If these would work, we would have a true IDE and for most parts we would not need the Smalltalk editor for building parsers.But, I could use some help on the todos left, especially on the refactorings.Cheers,Doru--
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev