Hi Mathieu,I know that you have to specify it :). All I am saying is that it would be great to have some sort of convention that alerts a user that some fancier decision is being made behind the scene when two specifications compete with each other. Perhaps having a certain name for the setting is good enough.Is this point really so terrible?
Cheers,Doru_______________________________________________On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:59 AM, <mathieubmddehouck@mailoo.org> wrote:
Hi
Well, maybe a thing to keep in mind is that there is no implicit resizing.You have to ask for it.
If you don't tell that you want nodes to be resize, the layout won't touch them, so basically, the layout will just move nodes.
And then, if you ask for it, the layout is able to resize the nodes following certain properties.
But it is important to think about it, because if Roassal purpose is really to work with some 5 000 nodes or more, we will soon have a problem of size, and we will need to automatically resize nodes.
Regards
Math
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev