On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Hi Usman,

Ok, so what you want is definitely not a class based specification of
the menu (as I see it now in your proposed changes), but a
browser-specific one.

So, in this case, why is it not enough to just build the menu manually?

Here is an example:

t := GLMTabulator new.
t column: #one.
t transmit to: #one; andShow: [:a |
               a list
                       display: [:model | model allClasses ];
                       selectionAct: [:list | list selection viewBlueprint ] entitled: 'Blueprint' ]
t openOn: MooseModel root allModels anyOne


Another option would be to just create your own polymorphic method for
MooseEntities that provides your desired set actions. So, instead of
using the default mooseFinderActions, you would use your own like
this:

yourOwnActions
 ...
 ^  aCollectionOfGlamourActions


And then in the browser:

               a list
                       ...
                       dynamicActionsOnSelection: [ :list | list selection yourOwnActions ]


Would that not be enough?

That's perfect because I want to reuse some existing menus...

That's resolves my problem.

thanx a lot.

Usman

 

Cheers,
Doru

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Usman,
>>
>> Could we start from your actual requirement?
>>
>> As I understood, you would just want to have a subclass of MooseModel, and
>> then have a MoosePanel that has a special menu for this entity. Is that so?
>
>
> This is just one requirement and it was not difficult to resolve and its
> done away with.
>
> The problem is occurring from the requirement that I need to build
> customized menus for entities in the model (FAMIXClass, FAMIXMethod, etc.)
> in my browser: I want to eliminate some menus (inspect, evaluate, etc.) for
> my entities.
>
> Now, the menus are defined in MooseEntity hierarchy so even if I am creating
> a different browser/finder, my patch blocks the menus for all browser and
> not just mine. So, the change set provides a way to resolve this problem,
> though not completely :-).
>
> hence the question: how to resolve the problem of customized menus for moose
> entities without impacting other browsers and without making the solution
> complicated?
>
> we can talk about it if you want.
>
> Usman
>
>
>
>>
>> If yes, the simplest way would be to define a YourPanel and build the menu
>> you want there. Would this not work?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On 8 May 2012, at 21:53, Usman Bhatti wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I took a quick look, and I think this is the wrong way to approach the
>> > problem. The default Moose menu relies on a lightweight implementation
>> > that is useful for just that: being a default menu. If you are adding
>> > multiple layers to this mechanism it will become too complex.
>> >
>> > I agree that adapting the current system for customization will make it
>> > more complex and difficult to manage.
>> >
>> >
>> > If you want to go into customization, than the way to go is to reify
>> > each action as an object and then assembly the menu by putting those
>> > objects together in the menu logic. Basically, you would need to
>> > implement a command hierarchy (like the hierarchy of
>> > MoosePanelCommand).
>> >
>> > So, you mean we need to create a default object for menu construction
>> > and customization are done by subclassing the default object?
>> >
>> > Usman
>> >
>> >
>> > So meaning that
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Doru
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > As discussed, I am working on the idea how to customize menus for
>> > > entities
>> > > in Moose Finder. As the menu construction depends on the pragmas
>> > > defined on
>> > > moose entity hierarchy, the idea is to read pragmas in some specific
>> > > way. We
>> > > tried something with Stéphane yesterday and here I am sending you the
>> > > change
>> > > set. Can you please have a look?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The change set does not complete resolve the problem :-). The problem
>> > > is
>> > > that menus are duplicated and changes are still invasive (that is the
>> > > code
>> > > overrides the default moose finder behavior). But this can be a
>> > > possible
>> > > approach to resolve it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > tx
>> > >
>> > > Usman
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Moose-dev mailing list
>> > > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > www.tudorgirba.com
>> >
>> > "Every thing has its own flow"
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Moose-dev mailing list
>> > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Moose-dev mailing list
>> > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Presenting is storytelling."
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>



--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev