Thanks for the prebuild image, works like a charm. For me is a
timely reading because I'm now redesigning the interface of my
project. I considered for a while jumping directly to bloc, but
there is still not enough documentation, so I will go with Spec
first. In fact there is a sense of continuous moving in Pharo that
is nice, but can be difficult at the same time.
So, some feedback:
a) All the looking is pretty nice. I specially like the "Window with
content" example (the one with the dog).
b) I think that we need visual clues to tell apart tabs from
buttons, from menus.
c) I was unable to find a named menu, only the vertical suspensive
points without any name. Named menus are a big advantage of Spec
over GT-Tools, so will be nice to have them on this new interface.
d) When you click on the examples window it doesn't raise over other
windows, you need to move it to get it raised.
e) Fonts seems kind of pixelated when compared between current pharo
4 and pharo + bloc. See the comparison here (left pharo 4, right:
Pharo + Bloc).
f) I have been looking for information
on how to renew the icons of my interface and material icons are
really nice. Would be useful to have them listed somehow besides
the current eclipse ones.
I wonder how difficult will be to migrate an interface from Spec
to bloc in the future. Should I stick with Spec?
Thanks and keep the good work.
On 27/08/15 15:00, Aliaksei Syrel wrote:
Moose-dev mailing list