Alexandre Bergel wrote: 
Roassal does not have any ROCircleLayout2. 
I think this class is only in your image.

I was once in my image.  What I could not understand is why after I deleted ROCircleLayout2, when I compare Changes to your mcz that obviously does not have ROCircleLayout2, Monticello is telling me that ROCircleLayout2 is missing from your mcz.  It is like there is some remnants of ROCircleLayout2 in my image after I deleted it.

cheers, ben 


Cheers,
Alexandre


On Sep 9, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Ben Coman <btc@openInWorld.com> wrote:

  
Ben Coman wrote:
    
I've been playing with ROCircleLayout in the form of ROCircleLayoutNew and ROCircleDynamicLayout.  This was mainly to deal with where element dimensions are much different (eg much wider than they are high).  Its not polished but I've come to the limit of time I can be distracted by it at this time, so I'm just presenting it in case you find anything useful.
Have a look at ROExample...
  #circleWideElements
  #circleWideElementsNewLayout
  #circleWideElementsDynamic
  #dynamicCirclePlay

cheer -ben


      
btw, I'm a bit confused by what Monitcello is showing me in terms of changes versus your Roassal.289 version.  It shows ROCircleLayout2 and ROCircleLayout3 as missing from your 289 mcz, which implies they are is in my image, except I have previously deleted those two classes from my image prior to saving through Monticello. Do they show up to you? 
<roassal changes monticello.png>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev