Hi Andrei,

well I don't know exactly what I want... my initial idea was to quickly stick something together and see what is available to me and what I can do.

But the overall idea is to extend the debugger to see metalinks-related info… such as the currently installed metalinks in a method, which one was called, stepping into and over the metalinks, etc. But I'll start small with some windows and slowly see where I can go from there.

Also… does the debugger uses regular Glamour? Can I read the Glamour docs to help me understand it? (I remember reading about Glamour long time ago and it had things like transmissions and ports… so maybe I can learn the behavior there.)

Thanks,

Peter

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Peter,

Yes, extending the debugger is more work than extending the inspector. However it depends on what you want to do. Do you need to change the UI of the debugger or just add new actions?

To create a new UI you need to subclass GTSUnitDebugger and override debuggerStructureIn: and debuggerTransmissionsIn:. You can the extend the UI using glamour presentations. On the class side of your UI you need to implement #defaultTitle, #handlesContext:. If you need to customize it more you can override at #helpClass, #sessionClass, #variablesBrowserClass and #availableAutomatically.

To create new actions you need to create subclasses of DebugAction. There are a lot of examples in the image. To link a action with a UI widget you need to add to the class side a method that just has an annotation. Different widgets load actions that have various annotations. For example the stack widget loads actions annotated with #gtStackDebuggingAction.

Let me know if you need more information to get started. Unfortunately there isn't a guide that you can use.

Cheers,
Andrei

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uhnak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

is there some guide / help how to extend the GTDebugger?

I tried to take a look at SUnit/PParser but it looks quite complex… certainly more complex than extending Inspector. :)

Thanks,
Peter

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev