On Aug 5, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Dennis Schenk wrote:

> Thanks the kudos :)
>
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
> >> Some information here: http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/students/dennisschenk
> >>
> >> And here are some pictures:
> >>      • Treemap of FAMIX: http://postimage.org/image/ck4vfoq77/
> what does it show?
>
> It shows a treemap of the hierarchical graph of the moose model of the FAMIX codebase ;)
>
> First I created a moose model, which went something like this:
>
> [...]
> importer model: model;
>     addFromPackagesNamed: (MooseScripts packageNamesFor: 'Famix*');
> [...]
>
> Then I created a hiGraph of the moose model. The hiGraph can then display itself as a treemap.
> The big rectangle on the lower right side is a method called mse with a weight of 5067 LOC and is, surprise, inside the package of VerveineJTestRessource.

ok should I conclude that you take the LOC as the metrics to compute the box size?

> In smalltalk we have a pretty flat hierarchy. So the outermost rectangle is a FAMIXNamespace, the inner containment rectangles (with the gray borders) are all FAMIXClasses, and the inner rectangles are all FAMIXMethods.
>
> If you compare the FAMIX treemap to the one of argoUML, you can see that we got a much more nested hierarchy (nested java packages). The darker the gray borders of the containment rectangles, the deeper the nesting level.

ok thanks

>
>
> Stef
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev