Thanks Jannik!A general question: are there exiting things to do with Dsm? If you have to redo your phd, would you take a different approach? If yes, which ones?
AlexandreOn May 3, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka@gmail.com> wrote:OK, thank you. Actually I am not reimplementing it. My first goal is to remove Mondrian in the simplest and acceptable way it is possible. Afterwards I can do better tools.Nice !Hope to see DSM implemented in Roassal soon :)JannikCheers,Jura_______________________________________________2013/5/3 jannik.laval <jannik.laval@gmail.com>Hi,
Really cool !
The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.
On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
>
> Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in Roassal?
>
> Thanks,
> Jura
Cheers,
Jannik
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
~~Dr. Jannik Laval~~
École des Mines de Douai
Enseignant-chercheur
http://www.jannik-laval.eu