On 26 Mar 2014, at 11:01, Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil@inria.fr> wrote:
I worked on the generic resolution mechanisms
I made some progress and am trying now to formalize what I learned and did in a coherent framework
I’ve seen that :) There is a method called #initScope in FAMIXContainerEntity. It’s overridden in FAMIXType, FAMIXBehaviouralEntity and FAMIXScopingEntity. All 4 methods are identical :). I think that I will help with this staff. I think that FAST deserves a good future.
Now the thing is that maybe we should make some general scoping package and then include it separately in FAMIX and in FAST. Because not FAST in hacking FAMIX for scopes.
Uko
_______________________________________________
nicolas
On 25/03/2014 08:58, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
Is anyone working on FAST now?
Uko
On 21 Mar 2014, at 19:05, Nicolas Anquetil <Nicolas.Anquetil@inria.fr> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Well to do code critics, you would need to have some representation of the source code in Famix.
Something like a Famix AST.
hummmm ....
somehow this reminds me of something ...
;-)
For those that could not follow, I am hinting here at FAST (FAMIX-AST) a project that started with FAST-pharo implemented by no other than Yuriy Tymchuk.
But seriously, I think that FAMIX is a bit high level to have many code critics rules.
Andre had implemented some of the rules of smalllint on Famix using arki, but there are many statement level details that are missing to go very far.
So I come back to my first answer, the solution seems to be FAST
nicolas
On 21/03/2014 16:45, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
Hi Chris.
The idea is a framework for defining and handling rules. For now on I want to try to implement something that works on FAMIX because it’s a well defined model which already has a lot of metrics implemented. We will see how it will work in future. I’d like to have it in Pharo on the same importance level as SUnit.
Cheers.Uko
On 21 Mar 2014, at 15:31, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb@gmail.com> wrote:
Cross-language code smells, or a framework to build a language specific code critic? I don't have either one, but the idea of a cross-languange code smell is interesting to me.
-cbc_______________________________________________
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk@me.com> wrote:
No. I want to work with rules that can find common code smells, and so I wander if something similar is implemented already.
Uko
Sent from my iPhoneWhat do you mean exactly?
Doru
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk@me.com> wrote:
Hi everyone.
Can someone tell me if there was any implementation of code critics-like framework on top of FAMIX?
Regards.
Yuriy
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
"Every thing has its own flow"_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev