Two points to answers (do not read this email if you are in hurry)

===================================================

Point 1 

=====

can you have a look at at my 23 commit changes?

Because I think that the logic is more robust:

Doing a join is too me more robust than a match.

As I already say it 

we want (version repo package)

and we have 

from the config repo package

and now we are taking from the image version and look for the package with a match

what I did is:

from the config repo package

from the image version package

Like that there is no possibility of mismatch

I will check why I got the other problems. It is probably in the configuration of synectique projects but still

having this match is a source of error. 

Point 2

=======================================================

Then I do not understand why Metanool does not list MooseCore as a dependency?

Could you reply to these points?

Stef

don't you think that Metanool should depend on Moose? Since it uses MooseEntity. 

baseline10: spec 
<version: '1.0-baseline'>

spec for: #common do: [
spec blessing: #baseline.
spec repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Metanool/main'.
spec
package: 'Metanool-Core' with: [spec requires: #('Fame' 'Magritte3')];
package: 'Metanool-Tests-Core' with: [spec requires: #('Metanool-Core')].
spec group: 'Core' with: #(
'Metanool-Core').
spec group: 'Tests' with: #(
" 'Magritte-Tests-Model'"
'Metanool-Tests-Core'). 
spec project: 'Magritte3' with: [
spec
className: 'ConfigurationOfMagritte3';
file: 'ConfigurationOfMagritte3';
version: #stable;
repository: 'http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritte3';
loads: #('Magritte-Model' 'Magritte-Tests-Model' 'Magritte-Morph' 'Magritte-Pharo-Model') ].
spec project: 'Fame' with: [
spec
className: 'ConfigurationOfFame';
version: #development;
file:  'ConfigurationOfFame';
repository: 'http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Fame/main' ].
]