On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<
alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
The truth is that we have not used this repo for a while.
Nowadays, all the tools produced by ObjectProfile are within the scope of
Moose. So it makes sense to stick to the Moose issue tracker.
It might be worth advising that on that repo home & wiki pages.
Otherwise people randomly searching for "ObjectProfile" may get a
wrong impression of abandonment from last activity date on the
tracker.
cheers -ben
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Ben Coman <btc@openInWorld.com> wrote:
What is the plan for...
https://code.google.com/p/objectprofile/
?
cheers -ben
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>
wrote:
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
Export complete
As a final step, I marked the Google Code project as moved, which now
redirects all links to GitHub. This is pretty cool! For example,
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1124 brings you
to GitHub Issue 1124 :) If
-----
Cheers,
Sean
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.chhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev